Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Sosyal Hizmette Toplum Merkezleri

Year 2019, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 187 - 212, 23.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.516802

Abstract

Toplumsal refah merkezleri işlevi taşıyan “Toplum Merkezleri” dünya genelinde en dinamik sosyal kurumlar olarak ele alınmaktadır. Toplum refahı amaçlı merkezler hareketi yirminci yüzyılın başlarında Avrupa ve Amerika kıtasında “Yerleşim Evleri” ve “Komşuluk Merkezleri” adıyla yoksullara ya da dezavantajlı insanlara öncelik veren toplum merkezleri ile başlamıştır. Günümüzde farklı etkinlikler düzenlense de halen yoksullara yönelik toplum temelli hizmetlerin sürdürülmesinde birçok toplum merkezi değişik adlarla faaliyet göstermektedir. Toplum merkezleri yerleşim evleri hareketinin önemli bir mirası olarak toplumda yaşanan sorunlara ilgi uyandırmayı, insanları sorun ve gereksinimler hakkında bilinçlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ülkemizde de yapılanma örnekleri bulunan toplum merkezleriyle ilgili olarak son yıllarda sosyal hizmet alanında çalışanlar kendi mesleki köklerine atıfla yerleşim evleri çalışma yönteminin öncelik kazandığını belirtmektedir. Bu çalışmada toplum merkezleri tarihsel gelişimi ile ele alınarak toplumsal gereksinimlere oluşturduğu yanıtlar değerlendirilmektedir.

References

  • Andrews, J. (1997). Helen Hall and the settlement house movement's response to unemployment: Reaching out to the community. Journal of Community Practice, 4(2), 65-75.
  • Barretta-Herman, A. (2011). The Future of Social Policy and Social Working the United States. ERISwebjournal,2:17-26. www.periodika.osu.cz/.../future_social_policy_usa_barretta_herm.
  • Batlan, F. (2006). Law and the Fabric of the Everyday: The Settlement Houses, Sociological Jurisprudence, and the Gendering of Urban Legal Culture. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal.15, 235-284.
  • Brieland, D. (1990). The Hull-House tradition and the contemporary social worker: Was Jane Addams really a Social Worker? Social Work, 35(2), 134-138.
  • Burke, T. (2010). Empiricism, pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist, 5(3), 73-88.
  • Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: a review of the literature. Social Service Review, 71(4), 521-547.
  • Chaskin, R. J. (2003). Fostering neighborhood democracy: Legitimacy and accountability within loosely coupled systems. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32 (2), 161-189.
  • Estes, R. J. (1997). Social work, social development and community welfare centers in international perspective. International Social Work, 40 (1), 43-55.
  • Glover, T. D. (2004). The ‘community’ center and the social construction of citizenship. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 63-83.
  • Karataş, K.(1999). “Toplum merkezleri düşüncesinin doğuşu ve gelişimi “Çağdaşlaşma Sürecinde Toplum Merkezlerinin Yeri ve İşlevleri” .Ed. Kasım Karataş, Ankara: Çağdaş Kadın ve Gençlik Vakfı. Çağdaş Kadın ve Gençlik Vakfı Yayını No.2,Ankara.
  • Kaya, T.(2017). Yerleşim Evleri ve Göçmenden Vatandaşa: Hull House Örneği. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35: 79-95.
  • Kalberg. S (1975). The Commitment to Career Reform: The Settlement Movement Leaders Source: The Social Service Review. 49(4): 608-628.
  • Karataş, C.(2009).Çok Amaçlı Toplum Merkezleri’nin Güneydoğulu Kadınlar Üzerindeki Sosyal ve Ekonomik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kadın Çalışmaları Anabilim Dalı Dönem Projesi. (Danışman: Doç. Dr. Alev Özkazanç)
  • Koerin, B. (2003). The settlement house tradition: Current trends and future concerns. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 30, 53.
  • Köngeter, S. (2012). Transnational Roots of the Settlement Movement—The Example of St. Christopher House in Toronto, Canada. Transnational Social Review, 2(2), M-43-47.
  • Mahmoudi, F. L. (2016). The value of the sense of community and neighbouring. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(3), 357-376.
  • Midyat Gündem(2018). Türk Kızılay’ı 14. Toplum Merkezi. Erişim Adresi:http://www.midyatgundem.com/gundem/turk-kizilayinin-14-toplum-merkezi-mardinde-acilacak-h814.html
  • Poole, D. L., & Colby, I. C. (2002). Do public neighborhood centers have the capacity to be instruments of change in human services? Social Work, 47(2), 142-152.
  • Rabin, L. M. (2009). Language ideologies and the settlement house movement: a new history for service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2),48-55.
  • Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2006). Community center practice—potential and possibilities for creating change. Journal of Social Work Practice, 20(1), 39-50.
  • Sosyal Hizmetler Çocuk Esirgeme Kurumu, 2010-2014 Stratejik Planı. Erişim Adresi:www.sp.gov.tr Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2018
  • Ergenç, S. (2009). Sosyal Politikalarda ve Sosyal Hizmetlerde Değişim Süreci (Yeni Bir Model Önerisi). Denetişim, (1): 35-41.
  • Şeker, M. (2011). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde sosyal projelerin etkisi: çok amaçlı toplum merkezleri (ÇATOM) projesi örneği. Sosyoloji Konferansları, (44): 257-274.
  • Sratejik Plan.(2012).T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı 2013- 2017 Stratejik Planı.www.sp.gov.tr/tr/stratejik-plan/s/.../Aile+ve+Sosyal+Politikalar+Bakanligi+2013-2017Erişim Tarihi:08.03.2018
  • Stratejik Plan.(2017).T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı 2018- 2022 Stratejik Planı.www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/CkPFg+ASPB_2018-2022_Stratejik_Plani.pdf Erişim Tarihi:02.07.2018
  • Tarlabaşı Toplum Merkezi. Erişim Adresi: http://www.tarlabasi.org/hakkimizda/tarihce
  • TEPAV,(2010). Sosyal Hizmetlerin Sunumunda Kademelenme. Erişim Adresi:www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1285329379-1.Sosyal_Hizmetlerde_Kademelenme.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018.
  • Trolander, J.A. (1987). From settlement houses to neigborhood centers: a history of the settlement house movement in the United States. Erişim Adresi: www.ifsnetwork.org/…./ a-history-of-the-settlement-hous:en. Erişim Tarihi:28.03.2018.
  • Wagner, A. R. (2006). The International Federation of Settlements and Neighborhood Centers: Celebrating 80 years and Committing to a New Future. IFS International Conference Berlin. Erişim Adresi: ifsnetwork.org
  • Wats, S. (2014). The Conscience of a Nation: The Social Work of Jane Addams in Chicago’s Immigrant Communities. Saber and Scroll. 3(2), Article 5.
  • www.kizilay.org.tr. Türk Kızılay’ı, Toplum Merkezi Projesi. Erişim Adresi:https://www.kizilay.org.tr/ Haber/KurumsalHaberDetay/2309. Erişim Tarihi: 03.03.2018.
  • Yan, M. C., Lauer, S., & Riano-Alcala, P. (2017). Incorporating individual community assets in neighbourhood houses: Beyond the community-building tradition of settlement houses. International Social Work, 60(6), 1591-1605.
  • Yan, M. C. (2004). Bridging the fragmented community: revitalizing settlement houses in the global era. Journal of Community Practice, 12(1-2), 51-69.
  • Yan, M. C.(2002a). Reclaiming the Social in Social Group Work: An experience of a Community Center in Hong Kong. Social Work With Groups,24(3), 53 – 65.
  • Yan, M. C. (2002b). Recapturing the history of settlement house movement: Its philosophy, service model and implications in China's development of community-based centre services. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 12(1), 21-40.
  • Yan, M. C., Lauer, S., & Sin, R. (2009). Issues in community rebuilding: The tasks of settlement houses in two cities. Social Development Issues, 31(1), 39-54.
  • Yan, M. C. & Sin, R. (2011). The resilience of the settlement-house tradition in community development: a study of neighborhood centers in San Francisco, Community Development,42(1):106-124.
  • Yılmaz, D ve Akhan, N. E. S. (2011). İlk Dönem Halkevlerinin Eğitim Faaliyetleri" Konya Halkevi Örneği". Karadeniz Araştırmaları.29:59- 95.

Community Centers in Social Work

Year 2019, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 187 - 212, 23.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.516802

Abstract

Community Centers which function as community welfare centers are known worldwide as one of the most dynamic social institutions. Community welfare center movement started in the beginning of the 20th century as settlement houses and neighborhood centers with the purpose of serving the poor and disadvantaged people. Although different activities are organized nowadays, many community centers operate under different names and continue community-based services for the poor. Community centers aim to raise interest in the problems experienced in society as an important legacy of the settlement houses movement and to raise awareness of people about problems and needs. As for the community centers in Turkey with examples of structuring in recent years, those working in the field of social services have stated that working with residential homes is a priority with reference to their professional roots. In this study, the historical development of community centers and their responses to social needs are evaluated. 

References

  • Andrews, J. (1997). Helen Hall and the settlement house movement's response to unemployment: Reaching out to the community. Journal of Community Practice, 4(2), 65-75.
  • Barretta-Herman, A. (2011). The Future of Social Policy and Social Working the United States. ERISwebjournal,2:17-26. www.periodika.osu.cz/.../future_social_policy_usa_barretta_herm.
  • Batlan, F. (2006). Law and the Fabric of the Everyday: The Settlement Houses, Sociological Jurisprudence, and the Gendering of Urban Legal Culture. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal.15, 235-284.
  • Brieland, D. (1990). The Hull-House tradition and the contemporary social worker: Was Jane Addams really a Social Worker? Social Work, 35(2), 134-138.
  • Burke, T. (2010). Empiricism, pragmatism, and the Settlement Movement. The Pluralist, 5(3), 73-88.
  • Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: a review of the literature. Social Service Review, 71(4), 521-547.
  • Chaskin, R. J. (2003). Fostering neighborhood democracy: Legitimacy and accountability within loosely coupled systems. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32 (2), 161-189.
  • Estes, R. J. (1997). Social work, social development and community welfare centers in international perspective. International Social Work, 40 (1), 43-55.
  • Glover, T. D. (2004). The ‘community’ center and the social construction of citizenship. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 63-83.
  • Karataş, K.(1999). “Toplum merkezleri düşüncesinin doğuşu ve gelişimi “Çağdaşlaşma Sürecinde Toplum Merkezlerinin Yeri ve İşlevleri” .Ed. Kasım Karataş, Ankara: Çağdaş Kadın ve Gençlik Vakfı. Çağdaş Kadın ve Gençlik Vakfı Yayını No.2,Ankara.
  • Kaya, T.(2017). Yerleşim Evleri ve Göçmenden Vatandaşa: Hull House Örneği. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35: 79-95.
  • Kalberg. S (1975). The Commitment to Career Reform: The Settlement Movement Leaders Source: The Social Service Review. 49(4): 608-628.
  • Karataş, C.(2009).Çok Amaçlı Toplum Merkezleri’nin Güneydoğulu Kadınlar Üzerindeki Sosyal ve Ekonomik Etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kadın Çalışmaları Anabilim Dalı Dönem Projesi. (Danışman: Doç. Dr. Alev Özkazanç)
  • Koerin, B. (2003). The settlement house tradition: Current trends and future concerns. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 30, 53.
  • Köngeter, S. (2012). Transnational Roots of the Settlement Movement—The Example of St. Christopher House in Toronto, Canada. Transnational Social Review, 2(2), M-43-47.
  • Mahmoudi, F. L. (2016). The value of the sense of community and neighbouring. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(3), 357-376.
  • Midyat Gündem(2018). Türk Kızılay’ı 14. Toplum Merkezi. Erişim Adresi:http://www.midyatgundem.com/gundem/turk-kizilayinin-14-toplum-merkezi-mardinde-acilacak-h814.html
  • Poole, D. L., & Colby, I. C. (2002). Do public neighborhood centers have the capacity to be instruments of change in human services? Social Work, 47(2), 142-152.
  • Rabin, L. M. (2009). Language ideologies and the settlement house movement: a new history for service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2),48-55.
  • Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2006). Community center practice—potential and possibilities for creating change. Journal of Social Work Practice, 20(1), 39-50.
  • Sosyal Hizmetler Çocuk Esirgeme Kurumu, 2010-2014 Stratejik Planı. Erişim Adresi:www.sp.gov.tr Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2018
  • Ergenç, S. (2009). Sosyal Politikalarda ve Sosyal Hizmetlerde Değişim Süreci (Yeni Bir Model Önerisi). Denetişim, (1): 35-41.
  • Şeker, M. (2011). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde sosyal projelerin etkisi: çok amaçlı toplum merkezleri (ÇATOM) projesi örneği. Sosyoloji Konferansları, (44): 257-274.
  • Sratejik Plan.(2012).T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı 2013- 2017 Stratejik Planı.www.sp.gov.tr/tr/stratejik-plan/s/.../Aile+ve+Sosyal+Politikalar+Bakanligi+2013-2017Erişim Tarihi:08.03.2018
  • Stratejik Plan.(2017).T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı 2018- 2022 Stratejik Planı.www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/CkPFg+ASPB_2018-2022_Stratejik_Plani.pdf Erişim Tarihi:02.07.2018
  • Tarlabaşı Toplum Merkezi. Erişim Adresi: http://www.tarlabasi.org/hakkimizda/tarihce
  • TEPAV,(2010). Sosyal Hizmetlerin Sunumunda Kademelenme. Erişim Adresi:www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1285329379-1.Sosyal_Hizmetlerde_Kademelenme.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.03.2018.
  • Trolander, J.A. (1987). From settlement houses to neigborhood centers: a history of the settlement house movement in the United States. Erişim Adresi: www.ifsnetwork.org/…./ a-history-of-the-settlement-hous:en. Erişim Tarihi:28.03.2018.
  • Wagner, A. R. (2006). The International Federation of Settlements and Neighborhood Centers: Celebrating 80 years and Committing to a New Future. IFS International Conference Berlin. Erişim Adresi: ifsnetwork.org
  • Wats, S. (2014). The Conscience of a Nation: The Social Work of Jane Addams in Chicago’s Immigrant Communities. Saber and Scroll. 3(2), Article 5.
  • www.kizilay.org.tr. Türk Kızılay’ı, Toplum Merkezi Projesi. Erişim Adresi:https://www.kizilay.org.tr/ Haber/KurumsalHaberDetay/2309. Erişim Tarihi: 03.03.2018.
  • Yan, M. C., Lauer, S., & Riano-Alcala, P. (2017). Incorporating individual community assets in neighbourhood houses: Beyond the community-building tradition of settlement houses. International Social Work, 60(6), 1591-1605.
  • Yan, M. C. (2004). Bridging the fragmented community: revitalizing settlement houses in the global era. Journal of Community Practice, 12(1-2), 51-69.
  • Yan, M. C.(2002a). Reclaiming the Social in Social Group Work: An experience of a Community Center in Hong Kong. Social Work With Groups,24(3), 53 – 65.
  • Yan, M. C. (2002b). Recapturing the history of settlement house movement: Its philosophy, service model and implications in China's development of community-based centre services. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 12(1), 21-40.
  • Yan, M. C., Lauer, S., & Sin, R. (2009). Issues in community rebuilding: The tasks of settlement houses in two cities. Social Development Issues, 31(1), 39-54.
  • Yan, M. C. & Sin, R. (2011). The resilience of the settlement-house tradition in community development: a study of neighborhood centers in San Francisco, Community Development,42(1):106-124.
  • Yılmaz, D ve Akhan, N. E. S. (2011). İlk Dönem Halkevlerinin Eğitim Faaliyetleri" Konya Halkevi Örneği". Karadeniz Araştırmaları.29:59- 95.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sociology (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sema Buz 0000-0002-8326-3732

Ali Artam Ayyıldız This is me 0000-0002-3854-4906

Publication Date January 23, 2019
Submission Date August 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 30 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Buz, S., & Ayyıldız, A. A. (2019). Sosyal Hizmette Toplum Merkezleri. Toplum Ve Sosyal Hizmet, 30(1), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.516802