Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 78 - 94, 30.06.2020

Öz

Son dönemde iktisat literatüründe yapılan çalışmalarla kurumların önemi daha iyi anlaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmada kurumlar ve kurumsal değişimi dikkate alan Kurumsal ve Organizasyonel İktisat ekolü anlatılacaktır. Neden Yeni Kurumsal İktisat’ın isminin değişerek bu isimle ilerlediği, bu ekolün metodolojisi, kullandığı araçlar, son dönemde odaklanılan hibrit düzenlemeler ve mezo-kurumların neler olduğu çalışmamızda özetlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Acemoğlu, Daron & James A. Robinson, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Books, 2012.
  • Acemoğlu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James Robinson. “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-run Growth”, Handbook of Economic Growth. 2005, c.1: 385-472.
  • Akerlof, George A. “The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”, Uncertainty in Economics. Academic Press. 1978, 235-251.
  • Aktan, Coşkun Can. “Mülkiyet Hakları İktisadı: Mülkiyet Yapısı ve İktisadi Performans Arasındaki İlişki”, Hak İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi. 2018, 7.19: 423-445.
  • Anderson, James E. & Leslie Young. “Imperfect Contract Enforcement”, NBER Working Papers. 2002, No.w8847.
  • Benham, Alexandra & Lee Benham. “The Costs of Exchange”, Ronald Coase Institute Working Paper. 2001, No.1.
  • Coase, Ronald Harry. “The Nature Of The Firm”, Economica. 1937, c.4. s.16: 386-405.
  • Coase, Ronald Harry. “Problem of Social Cost”, The Journal of the Law and Economics. 1960, c.3: 1-44.
  • Coase, Ronald Harry. “Interview: Why Economics Will Change”, International Society for New Institutional Economics. 2002, c.4. s.1: 1-7.
  • Çetin, Tamer. “Kurumsal ve Organizasyonel İktisat Üzerine”, İktisat ve Toplum Dergisi. 2016, c.64: 10-19.
  • Çiçen, Yıldırım Beyazıt. “Yeni Kurumsal İktisat Perspektifi ve İşlem Maliyeti”, içinde: “Kurumsal İktisat, Kurallar ve Kurumların İktisadi Gelişme Açısından Önemi”, ed.
  • Coşkun Can Aktan. SOBİAD Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Yayınları, 2020. ekitap Serisi. İzmir.
  • Dahlman, Carl J. “The Problem of Externality”, Journal of Law and Economics. 1979, c. 22. s.1: 141-162.
  • Demsetz, Harold. “Towards a Theory of Property Rights”, The American Economic Review. 1967, c.57. s.2: 347–359.
  • Demsetz, Harold. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights II: The Competition between Private and Collective Ownership”, The Journal of Legal Studies. 2002, c.31: 653-672.
  • Estache, Antonio & David Martimort. “Politics, Transaction Costs, and the Design of Regulatory Institutions”, World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. 1999, No.2073.
  • Furubotn, Eirik Grundtvig & Rudolf Richter. The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal Of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991.
  • Hart, Oliver, John Moore. “Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1988, c.56. s.4: 755-785.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues. 2000, c.34: 317-329.
  • Khan, Mushtaq H. “Governance and Growth: History, Ideology and Methods of Proof”, in: Good Growth and Governance in Africa: Rethinking Development Strategies. ed. Akbar Noman, Kwesi Botchwey, Howard Stein, Joseph E. Stiglitz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 51-79.
  • Klein, Benjamin. “Hold-up Problem”, in: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. ed. Peter Newman. Macmillan Reference Limited: 1998, c.2, 241.
  • Klein, Peter G. “New Institutional Economics”, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics 1. Aldershott, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000, 456-489.
  • Lueck, Dean & Thomas J. Miceli. “Property Law”, in: Handbook of Law and Economics Volume 1. 1. bs. ed. A.Mitchell Polinsky, Steven Shavell. UK: Elsevier, 2007 183-258.
  • Ménard, Claude. “Meso-institutions: The Variety of Regulatory Arrangements in the Water Sector”, Utilities Policy, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.05.001
  • Ménard, Claude. “Research Frontiers of New Institutional Economics”, RAUSP Management Journal. 2018, c.53. s.1: 3-10.
  • Musole, Maliti. “Property Rights, Transaction Costs and Institutional Change: Conceptual Framework And Literature Review”, Progress in Planning. 2009, c.71. s.2: 43-85.
  • North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change, And Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • North, Douglass C. “Economic Performance Through Time”, The American Economic Review. 1994, c.84. s.3: 359-368.
  • Roberts, Alasdair. “Bridging Levels of Public Administration: How Macro Shapes Meso and Micro”, Administration & Society. 2019, 0095399719877160.
  • Rodrik, Dani. “The Real Exchange Rate and Economic Growth”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2008, c.39. s.2: 365-412.
  • Rutherford, Malcolm. “Institutional Economics: Then and Now”, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2001, c.15. s.3: 173-194.
  • Simon, Herbert. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, in: Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. ed. Herbert Simon. 1957, New York: Wiley.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elemantary Considerations”, in: Strategy: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (Volume IV). ed. David Faulkner. New York. 1975.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, 1979, c.22. s.2: 233-261.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, American Journal of Sociology. 1981, c.87. s.3: 548-577.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1990, c.146. s.1: 61-71.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization”, Journal of Law and Economics. 1993, c.36. s.1: 453-486.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead”, Journal of Economic Literature. 2000, c.38. s.3: 595–613.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “The Theory of The Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract”, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2002, c.16. s.3: 171-195.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “Herbert Simon and Organization Theory: Lessons for the Theory of the Firm”, Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. 2004, 279: 295.
  • Williamson, Oliver E. “The Economics of Governance”, American Economic Review. 2005, c. 95. s.2: 1-18.
  • Wink Junior & Marcos Vinício & Hsia Hua Sheng & William Eid Junior. “Transaction Costs: An Empirical Analysis of Their Relationship With Investment and Foreign Direct Investment”, Revista De Administração De Empresas. 2011, c.51. s.2:175-187.
  • Yay, Serdar. “Mülkiyet Hakları İktisadına Giriş”, içinde: Kurallar ve Kurumlar. ed. Coşkun Can Aktan, Serdar Yay. Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2019, 73-88
  • Yılmaz, Feridun. “Avrupa’da Kurumsal İktisat: G.M. Hodgson Örneği”, içinde: Kurumsal İktisat. ed. Eyüp Özveren. İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, 2007.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yıldırım Beyazıt Çiçen 0000-0002-3425-280X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çiçen, Y. B. (2020). KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT. Hukuk Ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 78-94.
AMA Çiçen YB. KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi. Haziran 2020;12(1):78-94.
Chicago Çiçen, Yıldırım Beyazıt. “KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT”. Hukuk Ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi 12, sy. 1 (Haziran 2020): 78-94.
EndNote Çiçen YB (01 Haziran 2020) KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi 12 1 78–94.
IEEE Y. B. Çiçen, “KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT”, Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 12, sy. 1, ss. 78–94, 2020.
ISNAD Çiçen, Yıldırım Beyazıt. “KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT”. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi 12/1 (Haziran 2020), 78-94.
JAMA Çiçen YB. KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;12:78–94.
MLA Çiçen, Yıldırım Beyazıt. “KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT”. Hukuk Ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 12, sy. 1, 2020, ss. 78-94.
Vancouver Çiçen YB. KURUMSAL VE ORGANİZASYONEL İKTİSAT. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;12(1):78-94.