Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bibliometric analysis; Endodontics; Turkish Endodontic Journal
Kaynakça
- 1.Lorusso F, Inchingolo F, Scarano A. Scientific production in dentistry: The national panorama through a bibliometric study of Italian academies. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020.
- 2.Meriç G, Ozan O. Uluslararasi Literatürde Protetik Dis Tedavisi Alaninda Türkiye Adresli Yayinlarin Bibliyometrik Analizi/A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications from Turkey in Prosthetic Dentistry in International Literature. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18(1):23.
- 3.Cartes-Velásquez R, Manterola Delgado C. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in ISI dental journals, 2007–2011. Scientometrics. 2014;98(3):2223-33.
- 4.Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited articles in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(11):1650-64.
- 5.Al U, Soydal İ, Yalçın H. Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından bilig'in değerlendirilmesi. 2010.
- 6.Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285-96.
- 7.Bilgiç F, Küçük EB, Sözer ÖA, Ay Y, Kaya A, Kaptaç M. Analysis of six orthodontic journals in science citation index and science citation index expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2018;31(3):73.
- 8.Karaalioğlu Agdof, Kazancı Agdf. Sınıf 2 Malokluzyon Konik Diş Anomalisi Ve Hipodontiye Sahip Bir Hastaya Ortodontik Ve Protetik Yaklaşim. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;2009(3):198-202. 9.Peters OA. Rotary Instrumentation: An Endodontic Perspective. 2008.
- 10.Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatology international. 2013;33(2):277-84.
- 11.Parish AJ, Boyack KW, Ioannidis JP. Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0189742.
- 12.Ugolini D, Neri M, Cesario A, Bonassi S, Milazzo D, Bennati L, et al. Scientific production in cancer rehabilitation grows higher: a bibliometric analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2012;20(8):1629-38.
- 13.Frosch DL, Saxbe D, Tomiyama AJ, Glenn BA, Low CA, Hanoch Y, et al. Assessing the scholarly impact of health psychology: A citation analysis of articles published from 1993 to 2003. Health Psychology. 2010;29(5):555.
- 14.Asghari S, Navimipour NJ. Nature inspired meta‐heuristic algorithms for solving the service composition problem in the cloud environments. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2018;31(12):e3708.
- 15.So M, Kim J, Choi S, Park HW. Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: focused on non-quality factors. Quality & Quantity. 2015;49(4):1513-30.
- 16.Link AN, Vonortas NS. Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013.
- 17.Or S. Makale yayinlama sürecinde dergi seçimi. 2011.
Öz
Türk Endodonti Dergisinin Bibliyometrik Analizi
Amaç: Türk Endodonti Dergisi (TED), dünya çapında endodonti alanında eğitim, araştırma ve uygulamayı teşvik etmek için literatüre en yüksek standartta veri sağlamayı amaçlayan bir dergidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı diş hekimliği alanında ulusal yayın profilinin sunumuna katkı sağlamak amacıyla TED tarafından yayınlanan tüm makalelerin bibliyometrik profilini ortaya koymaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: TED'de yayınlanan tüm çalışmalar listelendi. Yayınların adı, yayın yılı, yazar sayısı, sorumlu yazar kurumları, sorumlu yazar ülkesi, makale türü, makale konusu, atıf sayısı, makalenin gönderim ve kabul tarihleri sınıflandırılarak Excel paket programına (Microsoft) kaydedilmiştir. Jamovi Yazılımı ile frekans analizi ve tanımlayıcı istatistikler yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Toplam 92 çalışmaya ulaşılmış, 85 çalışma çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Yayınlanan çalışmaların büyük çoğunluğu araştırma makaleleri iken (n=56, %65,9), azınlığı derleme makaleleridir (n=3, %3,5). Makale başına en fazla atıf 2,5±2,42 ile 2017 yılında bulundu. Konuların çoğu endodontik tedavi ve komplikasyonlarla (n=20, %25) ve azınlıkta ağrı teşhisi ve tedavisiyle (n=3, %1) ilgiliydi. Yükleme ile kabule kadar geçen ortalama süre 64,43 ± 53,33 idi.
Sonuç: TED yeni bir dergi olmasına rağmen her yıl düzenli olarak yayınlanmaktadır. Muhtemelen yeni dizinler ve daha kısa gönderim-kabul süreleri nedeniyle dergiye olan ilgi son yıllarda artmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Bibliyometrik analiz; endodonti; Türk Endodonti Dergisi
Bibliometric Analysis of Turkish Endodontic Journal
Background:Turkish Endodontic Journal (TEJ) is a journal that aims to provide the highest standard of data to the literature in order to promote education, research, and practice in the field of endodontics worldwide. The aim of this study was to present the bibliometric profile of all articles published by the TEJ in order to contribute to the presentation of the national publication profile in the field of dentistry.
Materials and Methods: All studies published in the TEJ were listed. The name of the publications, publication year, number of authors, principal author institutions, principal author country, article type, article topic, number of citations, submission and acceptance dates of the article were classified and saved in the Excel software package (Microsoft). Frequency analysis and descriptive statistics were performed with Jamovi Software.
Results: A total of 92 studies were reached and 85 studies were included in the study. While the majority of the published studies were research articles (n=56, 65.9%), the minority were review articles (n=3, 3.5%). The most citation per article was found in 2017, with 2.5±2.42. Most topics were related to endodontic treatment and complications (n=20, 25%), and a minority to pain diagnosis and management (n=3, 1%). The average time from submission to acceptance was 64.43 ± 53.33.
Conclusion: Despite being a novel journal, TEJ has been published regularly every year. Interest in the journal has increased in recent years, probably due to new indexes and shorter submission-acceptance time periods.
Keywords: Bibliometric analysis; Endodontics; Turkish Endodontic Journal
Anahtar Kelimeler
Bibliometric analysis Endodontics Turkish endodontic journal
Kaynakça
- 1.Lorusso F, Inchingolo F, Scarano A. Scientific production in dentistry: The national panorama through a bibliometric study of Italian academies. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020.
- 2.Meriç G, Ozan O. Uluslararasi Literatürde Protetik Dis Tedavisi Alaninda Türkiye Adresli Yayinlarin Bibliyometrik Analizi/A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications from Turkey in Prosthetic Dentistry in International Literature. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18(1):23.
- 3.Cartes-Velásquez R, Manterola Delgado C. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in ISI dental journals, 2007–2011. Scientometrics. 2014;98(3):2223-33.
- 4.Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited articles in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(11):1650-64.
- 5.Al U, Soydal İ, Yalçın H. Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından bilig'in değerlendirilmesi. 2010.
- 6.Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285-96.
- 7.Bilgiç F, Küçük EB, Sözer ÖA, Ay Y, Kaya A, Kaptaç M. Analysis of six orthodontic journals in science citation index and science citation index expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2018;31(3):73.
- 8.Karaalioğlu Agdof, Kazancı Agdf. Sınıf 2 Malokluzyon Konik Diş Anomalisi Ve Hipodontiye Sahip Bir Hastaya Ortodontik Ve Protetik Yaklaşim. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;2009(3):198-202. 9.Peters OA. Rotary Instrumentation: An Endodontic Perspective. 2008.
- 10.Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatology international. 2013;33(2):277-84.
- 11.Parish AJ, Boyack KW, Ioannidis JP. Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0189742.
- 12.Ugolini D, Neri M, Cesario A, Bonassi S, Milazzo D, Bennati L, et al. Scientific production in cancer rehabilitation grows higher: a bibliometric analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2012;20(8):1629-38.
- 13.Frosch DL, Saxbe D, Tomiyama AJ, Glenn BA, Low CA, Hanoch Y, et al. Assessing the scholarly impact of health psychology: A citation analysis of articles published from 1993 to 2003. Health Psychology. 2010;29(5):555.
- 14.Asghari S, Navimipour NJ. Nature inspired meta‐heuristic algorithms for solving the service composition problem in the cloud environments. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2018;31(12):e3708.
- 15.So M, Kim J, Choi S, Park HW. Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: focused on non-quality factors. Quality & Quantity. 2015;49(4):1513-30.
- 16.Link AN, Vonortas NS. Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013.
- 17.Or S. Makale yayinlama sürecinde dergi seçimi. 2011.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Diş Hekimliği |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 29 Nisan 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 |
